Cinemark Seeks $700,000 From Shooting Victims For Legal Fees

The Century 16 movie theater at the Aurora Mall in Aurora, Colorado on July 20, 2012. Photo Courtesy: UPI/Gary C. Caskey

AURORA, CO., June 3, 2016  (Gephardt Daily) — Cinemark, the multi billion-dollar company that owns the Aurora cineplex where 12 people were murdered in 2012, is seeking nearly $700,000 from several victims of the attack who unsuccessfully sued the theater chain.

Lawyers for Cinemark earlier this month filed a “bill of costs” for $699,187.13 in Arapahoe County District Court. Colorado court rules say that the winning side in a civil case is allowed to recover its litigation costs.

The action has caused a big backlash among theater goers for the second largest theater chain in the world. Angered patrons have created the hashtag #BoycottCinemark  and flooded social media pages after Cinemark announced its decision to file, according to Deadline.com.

 

Photo Courtesy: Twitter / Boycott Cinemark
Photo Courtesy Twitter Boycott Cinemark

The victims, more than two dozen survivors of the shooting and parents of those killed in it, sued Cinemark in state court in 2012.

They alleged that the theater was lacking in security measures, such as no armed guards on duty or gaps in security camera coverage. These lapses in security helped enable the attack, which also wounded 70 people.

A jury last month sided with Cinemark and found that the company was not liable for the shooting.

The Denver Post has reported more than half of the victims involved in the federal case settled for undisclosed terms with Cinemark prior to the judge’s order. One said the possibility of having to pay the company’s legal fees was a factor in his decision to settle.

Just because Cinemark has asked for the money doesn’t mean the victims will ultimately have to pay it. Judges must still approve the final totals in both cases.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Arapahoe County case have said they are considering an appeal of the verdict, the outcome of which could swing the cost debate. And, in other civil cases, it is not uncommon for the winning side to drop its cost demands in exchange for no appeal being filed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here