BREAKING NEWS: AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio Admits Guilt In Immigration Case

Sheriff Joe Arpaio aka America's toughest sheriff admits guilt in immigration profiling case
Controversial Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio aka “America’s toughest sheriff” admits guilt in immigration profiling case – Photo: UPI

Controversial Sheriff Joe Arpaio Admits Guilt In Immigration Case

By ANDREW V. PESTANO

PHOENIX, March 18 (UPI) — Controversial Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his chief deputy Gerald Sheridan accepted civil sanctions for contempt of court on Tuesday.

U.S. District Court Judge Murray Snow ordered a federal court hearing for April in connection to issues including Arpaio’s failure to comply with court orders to stop immigration enforcement operations, according to KJZZ radio in Phoenix.

Penalties for civil contempt of court are usually fines or payments to victims. The scheduled hearing is an evidentiary hearing where officers would have to testify.

Arpaio needed to comply with changes to his agency set by Judge Snow after losing a 2007 class action racial profiling lawsuit. Evidence shows that Arpaio failed to comply with the orders in recent months, leading Snow to call next month’s four-day hearing starting April 21.

Arpaio and Deputy Sheridan admitted to violating Snow’s orders three times, including the failure to stop a 2011 court order telling Maricopa police to stop detaining immigrants solely on racial profiling.

“There is nothing Defendants can do to change what has already been done,” a joint motion by Arpaio and Sheridan states. “But through the entry of an order finding them in civil contempt and by implementing remedies discussed herein, Defendants can express sincere remorse to the Court and to Plaintiffs, begin to make amends to those who have been injured and take affirmative steps to ensure nothing like this occurs in the future.”

Arpaio and Sheridan hope Judge Snow will cancel the hearing in April.

“Under these circumstances, a 4-day evidentiary hearing, which would cost the county taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, and which would consume significant time of the Court, is unnecessary,” the motion adds.

Copyright 2015 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here