Ex-Penn State coach Sandusky to testify Friday for first time in child sex abuse case

Former Penn State University football assistant coach Jerry Sandusky arrives for closing arguments in his child sex abuse trial at Centre County courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa., on June 21, 2012. He was ultimately convicted and sent to prison for 30-60 years. Friday, Sandusky is scheduled to testify in open court for the first time in an effort to seek a new trial. File Photo by George M. Powers/UPI

BELLEFONTE, Pa., Aug. 11 (UPI) — Former Penn State University football coach and convicted child sex abuser Jerry Sandusky will testify in open court Friday for the first time in the case, as part of an effort to seek a new trial.

Sandusky’s attorney, Alexander Lindsay, has argued in court papers that a combination of legal missteps by prosecutors, and even defense counsel, in 2012 denied his client a fair trial.

Centre County Judge John Cleland has agreed to hear new arguments for a retrial and scheduled three days of hearings for that purpose, starting Friday.

Sandusky, 72, waived his right to a preliminary hearing in 2011 and chose not to testify during trial in 2012.

In court filings, Lindsay stated that numerous factors before the original trial transformed “an innocent man into one of the country’s most infamous ‘child predators.'”

Eight men testified against Sandusky at trial and claimed they were each sexually assaulted years ago, when they were children, by the assistant football coach on the Penn State University campus in State College, Pa.

However, Lindsay’s appeal claims, those victims were pressured by prosecutors and coached in their testimony.

Sandusky, who was one of Penn State’s top football assistants between 1969 and 1999, was ultimately convicted on numerous charges of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, criminal intent to commit indecent assault, unlawful contact with minors, corruption of minors and endangering the welfare of children.

He was convicted on 45 of the 48 counts against him and sentenced to between 30 and 60 years in prison. If his appeals are unsuccessful, Sandusky will likely die behind bars. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected a limited appeal in 2014.

Among Lindsay’s stated grounds for a new trial are prosecutorial misconduct and critical blunders by Sandusky’s former defense counsel. Under Pennsylvania law, if a convict can demonstrate that their counsel’s ineptitude directly led to a conviction, they may be awarded a new trial.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here