‘Rocky’ Anderson, Prop 2 groups fire warning shot against LDS Church, demand records of ‘domination and interference’ be frozen pending litigation

Attorney Ross "Rocky" Anderson (inset) has filed a letter of "notice" against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Photos -- Anderson: Wikimedia Commons/Don LaVange; Salt Lake Temple: Maxpixel.net

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah, Nov. 15, 2018 (Gephardt Daily) — Attorney Ross “Rocky” Anderson says he has put the LDS Church on notice that it should not destroy records documenting its potential interference with the Proposition 2 initiative approved by voters and set to be the subject of a special session prior to the legislature.

“We felt it was very important they understand we are contemplating legal action,” Anderson told Gephardt Daily, referring to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “We are asking everybody to refrain from destroying any documents or any electronic data.”

Anderson said records need to be be preserved for a potential lawsuit he anticipates he could file depending on the changes made in Proposition 2 as a result of the special session.

“Dear Gentlemen/Ladies,” begins the letter, titled “Notice to Maintain Records — LDS Domination.”

“There shall be no union of Church and State, nor shall any church dominate the State or interfere with its functions,” citing the Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 4.

Anderson said he has no doubt that the LDS Church will destroy records that cast it in an unfavorable light.

“It’s an incredibly closed and untransparent institution,” he said. “They’ve hidden much about their own history and about their influence in Utah politics.”

Anderson, who served as Salt Lake City’s mayor from 2000 to 2007, is representing clients:

TRUCE (Together for Responsible Use and Cannabis Education), a nonprofit
organization focused on educating the community and stakeholders about the legitimacy
of cannabis therapeutics.

The Epilepsy Association of Utah, a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing
opportunities for its members to live more normalized lives while managing their epilepsy.

Doug Rice, a retired paramedic-captain, cancer survivor and caregiver to an adult
special-needs daughter, who suffers from Angelman’s Syndrome and epilepsy and uses cannabis to control her seizures.

Christine Stenquist, a brain tumor survivor, mother of four, and cannabis advocate.

Anderson said Utah voters supporting Proposition 2, the medical marijuana initiative, is unprecedented in that voting results went against the stated wishes of the LDS Church.

“The people have voted, and there’s a constitutional provision allowing the People of the United States to exercise this power,” Anderson said.

“In this instance, the LDS Church lost. The majority of the voters supported Proposition 2, and it would make a mockery of the process that the people were able to exercise this kind of legislative power for the LDS Church to get a special session, and within a couple days, to essentially repeal the initiative and replace it with something radically different, but apparently approved by the LDS Church.”

Anderson’s “letter of notice” appears below.

● ● ●

Re: Domination and Interference by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints of Utah Legislature – Utah Proposition 2, Medical Marijuana Initiative

Notice concerning obligation to maintain records

Dear Gentlemen/Ladies:

There shall be no union of Church and State, nor shall any church dominate the State or interfere with its functions.

Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 4.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (“The Church of Jesus Christ”) has a long history of dominating and interfering with the government of the State of Utah, often dictating to state and municipal legislators what legislative measures or policies they are to support or oppose. That dominance and interference is prohibited by the Utah Constitution.

The power of The Church of Jesus Christ to control public laws and policies, and its
enthusiastic exercise of that power, is recognized not only throughout the State, but far
beyond Utah’s borders.

[I]f Utah is not the theocracy envisioned by pioneer leader Brigham Young and other early Mormons, neither has its government shed a perception that has endured since statehood—that the state’s true seat of power is the Church Administration Building at the bottom of Capitol Hill.

Mike Carter (AP), “In Utah, Separating Church From State Can Be Nearly Impossible: Religion: Mormons dominate virtually every aspect of political life here. The state has defied the church only once in the last 60 years,” Los Angeles Times, March 21, 1993. Virtually any issue the church deems a moral one is effectively decided at that point: Parimutuel betting (against). The MX missile (against). Tax deductions for religious contributions (for). The Equal Rights Amendment (against).

Id. The Church of Jesus Christ has caused the sponsorship, passage, and/or defeat of
many public laws—state, county, and municipal—for many years. It is common knowledge that no liquor bill, sex education bill, gambling bill, or sexual orientation/gender identity bill will be passed by the Legislature without the support of The Church of Jesus Christ. Numerous city councils passed equal housing and employment laws (which the claimants and their counsel wholly support), protecting the rights of members of the LBGTQ community, solely because they were instructed that they should, or that it was alright for them to do so, by The Church of Jesus Christ.

Some legislators have candidly disclosed the legislative control exercised by The Church of Jesus Christ. For instance, Carl Wimmer, who served in the Utah House of Representatives from 2007 to 2011, has recounted the control and pressure exercised by The Church of Jesus Christ as follows:

Wimmer said church lobbyists and House leaders conducted meetings to apply pressure that members derisively called “PPIs,” or personal priesthood interviews, a name the LDS Church gives to private member consultations held by leaders, and which Wimmer had himself participated in as an elders quorum president.

He said he spoke with a House colleague who told him “what he had just experienced was an intense, closed-door meeting with select members of House leadership and LDS Church lobbyists who made it abundantly clear that when HB116 [the guest-worker bill] came up for a vote, he was to support the bill, period.”

A House leader told him that, if the vote was close, the leader would “have to vote for it; I have no choice.”

Wimmer wrote, “There was an intensity I had never felt before or after on the House floor. It was the intensity that comes only from political bullying, and it killed me to know that this time the ‘bully’ was my own church.”

Lee Davidson and Matt Canham, “Mormon church lobbying in Utah’s Capitol—hardball
or light touch?,” The Salt Lake Tribune, March 29, 2015.

The control by The Church of Jesus Christ is exercised even if the end result dictated
by The Church of Jesus Christ is contrary to the views or wishes of the majority of
residents. Currently, the control being wielded by The Church of Jesus Christ is to ensure
that a special session of the Utah Legislature—at tremendous public expense—is held
within days of the effective date of an initiated state statute legalizing the medical use of marijuana for people with qualifying medical illnesses. The purpose of The Church of Jesus Christ in forcing the special session is to radically undermine and alter the new law, which garnered majority popular support in the last election (Utah Proposition 2, Medical
Marijuana Initiative (2018)). Vastly altering the law mandated by the people is contrary
not only to the popular will, but contrary to the intention expressed in the Utah Constitution
that the people can, through an initiative, directly exercise their constitutionally guaranteed
legislative power.

The Utah Constitution instructs that “[f]requent recurrence to fundamental principles
is essential to the security of individual rights and the perpetuity of free government.” Utah
Constitution, Article 1, Section 27. Hence, every person and institution seeking to
undermine the will of the people, as reflected in the passage of an initiative statute, should
be reminded, firmly, of the fundamental principles underlying Utah’s constitutional
recognition of the power inhering in the people and the prohibition against domination by
a church of the State or interference with its functions.

The Utah Constitution recognizes that all political power belongs to the people—
not the Legislature, not just the rich and the powerful, and not any religious organization.
In fact, the Utah Constitution makes clear that the people have the right to alter or reform
their government as the public welfare may require.

All political power is inherent in the people; and all free governments are
founded on their authority for their equal protection and benefit, and they have
the right to alter or reform their government as the public welfare may require.
Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 2 (emphasis added).

The Utah Constitution emphasizes the authority of the people that serves as the basis
for free government, for the equal protection and benefit of the people.

Because of the primacy of autonomy and political power held by the people, the
Utah Constitution recognizes that legislative power does not belong solely to the legislative
branch of government, but that “the Legislative power of the State shall be vested” also in
“the people of the State of Utah,” as provided in the constitutional provisions for popular
initiatives and referendums. Utah Constitution Article VI, Section 1.

Although initiative statutes may be amended or repealed by the Legislature, the
almost immediate extreme undermining of numerous provisions of Proposition 2 at the
behest of The Church of Jesus Christ is anti-democratic and contemptuous of the recognition in the Utah Constitution that the people are to have the power to enact legislative changes. To rest on the technical ability of the Legislature to amend or repeal initiative statutes, just as it can amend or repeal its own statutes, is to make a mockery of the initiative process and constitutional recognition that the people are to have some real legislative control—and The Church of Jesus Christ is not to interfere.

We represent the following:

TRUCE (Together for Responsible Use and Cannabis Education), a nonprofit organization focused on educating the community and stakeholders about the legitimacy
of cannabis therapeutics. TRUCE’s goal is safe, legal, sensibly regulated access to
medicinal cannabis for all patients who can benefit.

The Epilepsy Association of Utah, a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing
opportunities for its members to live more normalized lives while managing their epilepsy,
advocating for individuals living with epilepsy and seizure disorders, and providing
resources and education for their families, communities, and care givers.

Doug Rice, a retired paramedic-captain. He was deployed to the World Trade Center
in September of 2001 with Utah Task Force One, a FEMA urban search and rescue (USAR)
team. Doug is a cancer survivor. Doug and his wife are full-time caregivers to their adult
special-needs daughter, who suffers from Angelman’s Syndrome and epilepsy. Their
daughter uses cannabis to control her seizures. With prescription medications, she was
having between eight and twenty-four seizures each day, usually two to five minutes in
length. With the help of CBD (a cannabis compound that has significant medical benefits),
she experienced three to six seizures of less than one minute each day. Wanting to further
reduce her seizures, Doug tried adding THC (one of the cannabinoids identified in
cannabis) to her daily regimen in Colorado and his daughter had her first seizure-free day
in years.

Christine Stenquist, a brain tumor survivor, mother of four, and cannabis advocate.
At twenty-four years old, she was diagnosed with an Acoustic Neuroma, a rare benign
brain tumor. An unsuccessful surgery left 60% of the tumor still intact. At twenty-eight
years old, she was diagnosed with Trigeminal Neuralgia, known as the suicide disease
because of the extreme pain it causes. Over the following years, her health only worsened,
leaving her housebound and bedridden for the better part of two decades. In 2012, her
health declined even further. After her doctors could not recommend any adequate
treatments, she eventually tried cannabis and found that it reduced her nausea enough to
begin eating solid foods and reduced her pain enough that she was no longer bedridden and was able to volunteer full time to fight for her and other patients’ right to access medical cannabis.

We were contacted by these people and organizations for the first time during the
past two days. We are investigating a legal challenge to (1) the calling of a special session
of the Utah Legislature at the behest of The Church of Jesus Christ; (2) any effort, in
collusion with or at the behest of The Church of Jesus Christ, to materially alter the
initiative statute supported by a majority of voters who passed Proposition 2 in the recent
election; and (3) the long-term pattern of domination of the Utah Legislature and the
interference in the functions of Utah government by The Church of Jesus Christ.
Through discovery, after the filing of a lawsuit (if that is necessary and if claimants
determine that is the best route to take), we expect to obtain from you a number of
documents and things, including letters, memoranda, files stored on your computers, and
your telephones, including any voice messages, emails, or text messages or other data
storage, including records of deletions of data or destruction of documents. As part of our
initial discovery efforts, if discovery is undertaken, you will receive initial interrogatories
and requests for documents and things.

The failure to preserve and retain the electronic data and evidence outlined in
this notice may constitute spoliation of evidence, which may subject you to legal
claims for damages and/or evidentiary and monetary sanctions.

In order to avoid spoliation, you will likely be required to provide the documents
and data requested on the original media, or on exact copies of that media (sometimes
referred to as image, evidentiary, or mirror copies), and be able to prove that the original
matches the copy in every respect.

Additionally, in order to avoid spoliation, you are urged to suspend certain normal computer maintenance procedures, including, but not limited to, such procedures as de-fragmenting hard drives, deleting internet cookies, deleting browser history and favorites, and running any “disk clean-up” processes. We urge you to consult legal counsel about your duty to maintain records, to refrain from destroying documents or deleting any electronic data, and to suspend the above-referenced computer maintenance procedures.

We are likely to seek any evidence of deletions of electronic data or the destruction
of paper documents.

You are urged not to destroy, delete, disable, erase, encrypt, alter, or otherwise render unavailable any documents, electronic data and/or evidence relevant to the claims described above, and you are further urged to take reasonable efforts to preserve such data and/or evidence.

Electronic data, documents, and storage media that may be subject to discovery
requests and that you may be obligated to maintain and not alter or destroy include, but
are not limited to the following: correspondence, emails, faxes, texts, voice messages,
audio recordings, video recordings, business files, administrative records, written or
electronic communications, electronic copies of documents, or any other document or
record relating to any lobbying or communications by or on behalf of The Church of Jesus
Christ concerning any proposals, legislation, policies, or activities by any state, county, or
municipal legislative body or executive personnel at any time, as well as advocacy by or
on behalf of The Church of Jesus Christ relative to any initiative, referendum, legislation,
or government policy or practice.

You are urged to preserve all information and things necessary to access, view and
(if necessary) reconstruct the electronic data we may request through discovery.
With regard to electronic data created subsequent to the date of delivery of this letter,
we urge that relevant evidence is not to be destroyed and you are to take whatever steps
are appropriate to avoid destruction of evidence. In order to assure that your obligation to
preserve documents and things will be met, please forward a copy of this letter to all
persons and entities with custodial responsibility for the items referred to in this letter.
If there are any questions concerning the scope of this letter, please contact me, or—
if you are represented — have your lawyer contact me, before taking any actions with
respect to any records or data.

Also, if you would like to discuss a resolution of the claims outlined above, please have your lawyer contact me.

Thank you for your cooperation.


Ross C. Anderson


  1. Proposition 2 passed. Why all the anger now? Churches have always had the right to comment on issues. Do Utah taxpayers really want to waste money suing a church? Really?

    • Churches havent though. There hasn’t been a major church that’s spoken out against marijuana initiatives until now. Also the lds church hired a lobbyist…. a church with a lobbyist is shady as is but then used said lobbyist and other political kogs to covertly get what they want. The anger is because we the people passed prop 2, yes. But that isnt qhat thst are giving us. It’s something completely different. If one system in the state somehow outweighs the majority vote then that’s a huge problem down to the constitution. They either lose their tax exempt status costing them, millions, or stop meddling in state affairs outside of a voting booth. How could you not be angry. Your right we voted, you should be just as ashamed of our state.

    • It’s not about the church voicing concern, did you even read what the lawsuit is about or how the Mormon church tries to dictate how things are done in this state.

      Yes Prop 2 passed but now the governor and the church and legislators are holding a special session to rewrite a compromise and change how prop 2 is.

    • Rewriting a law brought forth for the vote and passed by the people isn’t “churches commenting on issues”. It’s a church exercising political power, which is unconstitutional. They should have their tax exempt status revoked for it.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here