Goodbye Shirtless Models: Abercrombie & Fitch Changes Look Policy

Abercrombie & Fitch
Shoppers walk past an Abercrombie & Fitch retail clothing store in Paramus, New Jersey on July 9, 2013. Photo by Northfoto/Shutterstock

Goodbye Shirtless Models: Abercrombie & Fitch Changes Look Policy

Shoppers walk past an Abercrombie & Fitch retail clothing store in Paramus, New Jersey on July 9, 2013. Photo by Northfoto/Shutterstock
Shoppers walk past an Abercrombie & Fitch retail clothing store in Paramus, New Jersey on July 9, 2013. Photo by Northfoto/Shutterstock

NEW YORK, April 24 (UPI) — The culture of muscle-bound salesmen and Barbie-perfect saleswomen is changing at Abercrombie & Fitch. Employees will no longer be hired based on body type and attractiveness.

The teen-focused clothing brand isoverhauling its legendary “Look Policy” that addressed everything from French manicures (a no-no) to hair styles (only natural looks). The store will now put a bigger emphasis on customers and less on its “models” — Abercrombie-speak for store employees.

The changes come as the company tries to distance itself from longtime CEO Michael Jeffries who left in December, criticized for saying only “cool, good-looking people” should wear his clothes.

“We are focused on the future not the past, and there is complete alignment that these are the right changes,” said A&F brand president Christos Angelides.

In addition to no longer hiring people based solely on looks, the company will stop requiring employees to wear Abercrombie duds exclusively. The dance-club store atmosphere, which included blaring music, flashing lights and a strong scent of cologne, is going to be toned down to create a “more pleasurable shopping experience.” Employees will now be called “brand representatives.” And those shirtless, hunky guys at store openings, and other sexualized marketing, will be a thing of the past.

Abercrombie’s Look Policy has gotten the company into trouble more than once. In February, U.S. Supreme Court justices heard arguments in the case of Samantha Elauf, a Muslim teen who was denied a job because she was wearing a head scarf. The company argued its actions were legal because it didn’t know the scarf was for religious reasons. In 2013, Abercrombie settled two similar lawsuits in California for a combined $71,000.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here